Report: Cavs Out Of The Picture, But Nets Still Working On Mega-Deal To Land Howard

Posted: July 10, 2012 in SPORTS

Reblogged from CBS New York:

NEW YORK (WFAN/AP) -- Deron Williams and Dwight Howard talked about being NBA teammates four years ago during the Olympics. Now Williams knows there's speculation that it could happen soon.

He's aware of reports that Orlando and Brooklyn are trying to arrange a complicated trade -- possibly involving two other teams -- but he's not paying too much attention to that.

Read more… 603 more words

JBLENDZ (Chicago) - Does anyone remember the NBA strike from last summer, 2011? One of the main bullet points of the labor dispute was the so-called building of Super Teams in big markets. Owners of small market teams complained about players collaborating to form teams of superstars in cities like Miami, LA, and Boston; leaving smaller market teams like Charlotte, Toronto, and Utah places to avoid playing for if you want shoe deals and other lucrative endorsements. The idea players have to form "Super Teams" to win championships could change the balance of power in the league, making it virtually impossible for teams in smaller markets to compete without talent. Sure these small market teams will most likely land the top picks in the draft but it won't be enough to sell out a stadium or get massive television contracts. Let's face it, when certain teams with little or no talent play in bigger markets, there is no interest in attending games and everyone loses money. This was said to be the reason league president, David Stern, blocked a deal that had Chris Paul leaving New Orleans (small market team) to play in Los Angeles (big market team). The twist to that deal? The league owned the rights to New Orleans, so what you had was the individual that approved or disapproved deals for the league making a deal within the league. Can you say conflict of interest? Nonetheless, Steve Nash joining the LA Lakers, Dwight Howard possibly signing with the Brooklyn Nets, along with other free agent moves happening this 2012 offseason have some asking; Was the NBA strike meaningful? Has the nightmare of the small market teams come true? If the main focus of the labor dispute was to prevent Super Teams from forming, did it work? Only time will tell but for now, a big flop!!!
Comments
  1. Hamster says:

    Well for a while now, the NBA has not lived up to the much more exciting days of Da Bulls vs the Detroit Bad Boys. To be honest there is no real rivalry other than the Laker/Celtic rivalry. And with the trade of “Jesus” I think the Celtics’s makeover will not gel like the Big Three had done in just one season. So to answer your question, No, the NBA strike was less than meaningful. The league is back to its same antics. The labor dispute was in vain.

    Just my to cents…….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s